Challenges in situated knowledge production: Contributions from Southern, critical, decolonial and feminist epistemologies
Challenges in situated knowledge production: Contributions from Southern, critical, decolonial and feminist epistemologies
Challenges in situated knowledge production: Contributions from Southern, critical, decolonial and feminist epistemologies
Research and Intervention in Mental Health
9:00-10:30 New York/ 10:00-11:30 Buenos Aires/ 21:00-22:30 Beijing & HongKong/ 23:00 – 00:30 Sydney
**This event will be recorded. Registrants will receive the recording link via email after the live session.**
Webinar Description
Modern northwestern science is a social historical construction, culturally situated, whose definition varies historically. We consider it necessary to analyze how knowledge is produced (its epistemological foundations) and consider it as a process in which some actors, such as researchers, governments, and economic actors, define what knowledge is and how to produce it. These mentioned social actors define how to investigate, what problems to address, and how to interpret their results. The use of diverse methodologies, from critical, decolonial and participatory perspectives, shows us that not all have a unique form to be seen and thought, it denaturalizes the views on the field and promotes situated and valid knowledge, questioning the heteronomous definition of problems that comes from dominant actors that live far from the communities. It is essential to address sociocultural diversity, and to include different social actors in the planning and evaluation processes, from the definition of what is considered problematic, the evaluation of resources, proposals, or redefinitions, to the use of results.
Addressing themes such as health-disease-care processes, as well as stigmatization, medicalization and pathologization in contemporary socio-cultural contexts, cannot be approached from perspectives that exclude the persons involved; they require tools that give rise to diverse voices, knowledge and practices involved. In this sense, we propose sharing contributions and reflections based on situated and participatory practices and experiences in research, evaluation and intervention in and with different groups and experiences.
Reviewing epistemological positions, contexts of emergence, theories and practices is key to understanding the interface health prevention and promotion. Especially in mental health, requires comprehensive, participatory approaches that include a decolonial and human rights-based perspective, working in communities and including diverse forms of culture and art. A critical and reflexive perspective, combined with an ethnographic and evaluative view, is essential to recontextualize problems that articulate from daily life and professional praxis and training, to the management, implementation and evaluation of policies.
Therefore, theoretical and practice production must recognize the involvement with others and promote participatory designs and research that allow capturing the complexity of the realities studied, integrating qualitative and quantitative tools. In the health field, it is necessary to reflect on work strategies and alternatives for insertion in new spaces, reviewing epistemological positions and historical practices.
Addressing the complexity of these processes involves rethinking interdisciplinary, intersectoral and contextualized work. The critical perspective is crucial to avoid a naturalizing and scientistic view, avoid reductionisms and promoting a complex reading and a contextualized evaluation, which are fundamental tools to understand the tensions and challenges in the implementation of policies and practices.
Curator
Dr. Hilda Wengrower
Hilda Wengrower, DMT, Psy.D., has taught and lectured in different countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, the Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, Korea, Italy, Spain, UK, etc). She collaborates with international associations and is frequently invited to present at plenary panels and lectures. Hilda also maintains a private supervision practice.
She has published papers and book chapters in several languages on topics including arts therapies in educational settings, Dance Movement Therapy (DMT) with children with behavioral disorders, arts-based research, DMT and psychiatry, migration, and the teaching and training of DMT.
She is the book reviews editor of the international journal Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy.
She co-edited The Art and Science of Dance/Movement Therapy: Life is Dance with Sharon Chaiklin—published in six languages, including two English editions by Routledge—and Dance and Creativity within Dance Movement Therapy: International Perspectives. She was also co-editor of ECArTE’s book Traditions in Transition in the Arts Therapies.
Speakers
Dr. María Marcela Bottinelli
BA in Psychology (UBA: University of Buenos Aires), Master in Scientific Research Methodology and PhD in Community Mental Health (UNLa). Lecturer and Researcher in undergraduate and graduate courses. Researcher Cat. I of the Argentine National System. Coordinator of multicenter projects and research director for different institutions in the health-education-community interface. Member of the Board of Directors of the Argentine Public Health Association and EvaluAR Network. Held various management positions in universities. President of the National Honorary Advisory Council on Mental Health and Addictions (2017-2021). Director of the Master in Dance Movement Therapy at the National University of the Arts. Advisor and evaluator for different national and international programs, projects and organizations. Author and co-author of numerous dissertations, presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Compiler and co-author of 8 books, the latest ones include: “Tramas en la formación” (Training Plots), “Cuidar en la Emergencia” (Caring in the Emergency) and “Contributions to Thinking about the State in an exceptional situation”
Dr. Claudia Bang
PhD in Psychology, Master in International Public Health and Psychodramatist. Researcher at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Buenos Aires and Director of projects that articulate participatory art and mental health promotion. She is a Consultant and evaluator of research and university outreach projects.
Professor of undergraduate and graduate courses at national and international universities. Author of the book “Creatividad y salud mental comunitaria”, Lugar, 2016. (Creativity and Community Mental Health) and of numerous articles in international scientific journals. Member of various organizations in defense of dignified and comprehensive care for mental health in the community.
Expected Outcomes:
- Getting to know the ontological, epistemological, political and theoretical frameworks that allow us to include local knowledge and forms of production and interpretation of them.
- Contributing to the construction of respectful ways of working with and from diversity, the perspective of rights, relational ethics, the integration of paradigms and methodologies, the dignity of life.
- Attendees will meet some experiences of intervention using arts.
This event is free for IACAET Registered members
Additional Details
Event Mini Content
Modern northwestern science is a social historical construction, culturally situated, whose definition varies historically. It is crucial to analyze how knowledge is constructed (epistemological foundations) and consider it as a process in which some actors (researchers, governments, economic, etc) define what knowledge is and how to produce it. These mentioned social actors determine how to investigate, what problems to address, and how to interpret their results. The use of diverse methodologies, from critical, decolonial and participatory perspectives, show us that not all has a unique form to be seen and thought, it denaturalizes the views on the field and promotes situated and valid knowledge, questioning the heteronomous definition of problems that comes from dominant actors and social actors outside the communities. It is essential to address sociocultural diversity, and to include different social actors in the planning and evaluation processes, from the definition of what is considered problematic, the evaluation of resources, proposals, implementations or redefinitions, to the subsequent use of results.